Slip distribution for different smoothing factors: (a) κ = 0 . 10, (b)

Download scientific diagram | Slip distribution for different smoothing factors: (a) κ = 0 . 10, (b) κ = 0 . 18, (c) κ = 0 . 30. We pick the second as the resultant model because of its good compatibility between weighted mis fi t and solution roughness. The numbers between the triangles in (a) indicate the segments. The white star denotes the epicenter from Harvard CMT solution.  from publication: 3-D coseismic displacement field of the 2005 Kashmir earthquake inferred from satellite radar imagery | Imagery, Imagery (Psychotherapy) and Earthquake | ResearchGate, the professional network for scientists.

Joint inversion of ocean-bottom pressure and GNSS data from the 2003 Tokachi-oki earthquake, Earth, Planets and Space

In situ characterisation of the strain fields of intragranular slip bands in ferrite by high-resolution electron backscatter diffraction - ScienceDirect

ESurf - Automated classification of seismic signals recorded on the Åknes rock slope, Western Norway, using a convolutional neural network

Interseismic slip rate and locking along the Maqin–Maqu Segment of the East Kunlun Fault, Northern Tibetan Plateau, based on Sentinel-1 images - ScienceDirect

Earthquake Report: M 6.8 Morocco - Jay Patton online

PDF) 3-D coseismic displacement field of the 2005 Kashmir earthquake inferred from satellite radar imagery

Complex multi-fault rupture and triggering during the 2023 earthquake doublet in southeastern Türkiye

PDF) 3-D coseismic displacement field of the 2005 Kashmir earthquake inferred from satellite radar imagery

Probing time-dependent afterslip and viscoelastic relaxation following the 2015 Mw7.8 Gorkha earthquake based on the 3-D finite-element model, Earth, Planets and Space

Slip distribution for different smoothing factors: (a) κ = 0 . 10, (b)

Injection-induced fault slip and associated seismicity in the lab: Insights from source mechanisms, local stress states and fault geometry - ScienceDirect