Navy Outlines Planning, Execution Failures in Cruiser

The Navy’s push to retire seven guided-missile cruisers stems from management and planning in its original modernization program that caused exorbitant cost growth, according to service officials. Navy officials have repeatedly cited cost as a reason for the proposed decommissionings, arguing that the service could put the money toward other modernization priorities instead of sustaining the aging platforms. “The cruisers right now and the modernization are running 175 to 200 percent above estimated costs, hundreds of days delay. These ships were intended to have a 30-year service life, we’re out to 35,” Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Mike Gilday told

How the Navy Spent Billions on Failed Littoral Combat Ship Program — ProPublica

Report: Carnival Splendor power loss likely caused by crew member error

The next generation of navigation solutions

Navy struggling to keep RFA Fort Victoria operational

Rep. Mike Gallagher Archives - USNI News

QUESTION for any ship experts in here, what is the purpose of the little rudder at the bottom of bigger Imperial ships? Also same question with the big poles jutting from the

USS Anzio Archives - USNI News

MDC第二論壇- 中華民國海軍未來發展討論區20

Evolution of Naval Weapons

Nita Lewis Shattuck on LinkedIn: Why can't the Navy keep its

The Nation Needs a 400-Ship Navy

Changing Surface Warfare Qualifications: Better Incentives Make Deadlier Officers

USNI News - Page 242 of 852 - Maritime News and Analysis

Search U.S. Naval Institute