Mechanical vs manual CPR compressions

By A Mystery Man Writer

Meta-analysis of the available research looks at primary and secondary patient outcomes of applying mechanical CPR compression devices following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation in “hostile” environments: Using automated compression devices to minimize the rescuers' danger

LUCAS Versus Manual Chest Compression During Ambulance Transport: A Hemodynamic Study in a Porcine Model of Cardiac Arrest

Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine

Mechanical chest compressions and survival in the emergency setting

Optimal Use of Automated Mechanical Chest Compression Devices During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - JEMS: EMS, Emergency Medical Services - Training, Paramedic, EMT News

JCM, Free Full-Text

Cardiac Care Show - Episode 1: Mechanical CPR - ECG Medical Training

Full article: Chest Compression Fraction between Mechanical Compressions on a Reducible Stretcher and Manual Compressions on a Standard Stretcher during Transport in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests: The Ambulance Stretcher Innovation of Asian

Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - LUCAS Device

Mechanical CPR Devices - The current evidence

Cardiac Arrest - CPR, defibrillation, medications, airway

JCM, Free Full-Text

Mechanical vs Manual CPR Chest Compressions

©2016-2024, reintegratieinactie.nl, Inc. or its affiliates