By A Mystery Man Writer
Proof is central to the curriculum for undergraduate mathematics majors. Despite transition-toproof courses designed to facilitate the shift from computation-based mathematics to proofbased mathematics, students continue to struggle with mathematical proof. In particular, there are few tasks beyond writing proofs that are specifically designed to develop students’ understanding of the proofs they read and the proof methods they utilize. The purpose of this paper is to introduce and discuss the merits of two such tasks: constructing and comparing logical outlines of presented proofs. Grounded in APOS Theory, this paper will illustrate a case study that suggests students can improve their understanding of the proofs they read as well as a particular proof method proof by contradiction – through these two tasks.
PDF) Developing and validating proof comprehension tests in undergraduate mathematics
Investigating the Development of Proof Comprehension: The Case of Proof by Contradiction
Ernest Nagel, James R. Newman, Douglas R. Hofstadter - Godel's Proof, Revised Edition -NYU Press (2001).pdf
Mathematical Reasoning: Writing and Proof, Version 2.1 - Open Textbook Library
Mathematics, Free Full-Text
Synchronicity: An Acausal Connecting Principle. (From Vol. 8. of the Collected Works of C. G. Jung) (Jung Extracts, 30): 9780691150505: Jung, C. G., Hull, R. F.C., Shamdasani, Sonu, Shamdasani, Sonu: Books
PDF] Developing Proof Comprehension and Proof by Contradiction Through Logical Outlines
Transitions and Proof and Proving at Tertiary Level
Methods Of Proof Bundle
What preliminaries are required before one can begin to understand zk-SNARK (zero-knowledge proof)? - Quora
Comparative judgement, proof summaries and proof comprehension